Why Did The Oslo Agreement Fail
The Palestinians believed that the Oslo Accords included a firm commitment by Israel to stop the expansion of the settlements and even begin to dismantle them. Although there was no such explicit commitment in the signed agreements, the Palestinians argue that it must have been taken for granted by the Israelis and that such conditions would be a minimally necessary condition for the Palestinians to accept an agreement. The Palestinian economy has entered a downward spiral. When the second intifada led to permanent Israeli closures and stifled all trade, it went into a coma. Observers in Washington concluded that the Palestinian Authority was a “failed state” that can only be brought back to normal through “regime change.” Yitzhak Rabin, Israel`s prime minister at the signing of the agreements (who was assassinated by a right-wing Jewish Israeli in 1995), put it rather inelegantly when he said the Palestinian Authority would fight terrorism more effectively than Israelis could ever because it would operate without restrictions imposed by “human rights groups and the Israeli Supreme Court.” In that statement, he expressed the hope that many Israelis would support the agreement for an anti-terrorist alliance between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. The Oslo Accords even established “joint patrols” involving Israeli and Palestinian soldiers who patrolled side by side to prevent terrorist attacks. The Oslo Accords are two agreements between the Israeli Government and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO): the Oslo I Accords, signed in Washington, D.C., in 1993;  and the Oslo II Agreement, signed in Taba, Egypt, in 1995.  The Oslo Accords marked the beginning of the Oslo Process, a peace process aimed at achieving a peace treaty based on UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 and realizing the “right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.” The Oslo process began after secret negotiations in Oslo that led to the PLO`s recognition of the State of Israel and Israel`s recognition of the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and as a negotiating partner. Today, the number of Israeli settlers in the West Bank exceeds 350,000. There are another 300,000 Jews living in settlements across the pre-1967 border in East Jerusalem. Thousands more settlement houses are planned or under construction. Despite all efforts, JOHN Kerry, the US Secretary of State, failed to persuade the Netanyahu government to accept a settlement freeze as a precondition for the resumption of peace talks suspended in 2010. As long as Netanyahu remains in power, it is a safe bet that no breakthrough will be made in the new round of talks.
He is the procrastinator par excellence, the deceitful Prime Minister who pretends to negotiate the distribution of pizza while continuing to devour it. 4. Both Parties agree that the outcome of the permanent status negotiations should not be affected or anticipated by the agreements concluded for the transition period.  Oslo was conceived from the outset as an interim agreement, as a prelude to the difficult negotiations expected on a final agreement. An important part of this was that peace could be spread by the goodwill of the leaders of the two peoples. It hardly seems possible that 25 years have passed since the signing of the Oslo Accords, that hopeful moment when peace between Palestinians and Israelis seemed near. .